"If it ain't broke, don't fix it"
The original Whizzer company supported the right side of the crankshaft with a Torrington needle bearing mounted in the sidecover. The WC-1 new edition motor used a similar needle bearing. The NE motors sported a new sidecover that was thicker so that allen screws could be used to attach it to the crankcase. The original Whizzer used different thickness spacers to keep the crankshaft centered, the new company didn't make any provisions to keep it centered. Often on the new generation motors the crankshaft will move sideways, but usually isn't a real serious problem [unless you are running at "Bonneville"].
I have 3 motors on my bench from owners to rebuild. One is a WC-1 with a Westman cylinder, and the crankshaft is "solid". The second motor is a 2006 NE, and the crankshaft moves approx. 1/8" side to side. The third motor is a 2008 NE, and the crankshaft "wobbles" and moves from side to side approx. 3/8". The play on the 2008 was way too much, so I removed the side cover to see what I needed to do, and to my surprize, the German needle bearing wasn't there, instead a #6904 ball bearing was mounted in the side cover. The bearing was so loose in the cover it fell out when I turned the cover over.
I was still in shock that the quality needle bearing had been replaced with thin ball bearing. I quickly located my bearing book and looked up the number, sadly here are the facts. The bearing is called an "Extremely Light Plain Ball Bearing" and has a very, very, very low rating of 1824 @ 1000 RPMs. The original needle bearing is 12 MM wide, whereas the replacement is only 9 MM wide. Not only is the new bearing much thinner, but it is recessed deeply into the side cover. They also located 4 washers on the end of the crankshaft to help make up the extra space, but only a part of the crankshaft rides inside the bearing [very little support]. The earlier NE motors that used the needle bearing enjoyed complete crankshaft support and a bearing that was rated with a load capacity of 12100 [static], about 15 times better than the current ball bearing.
Was the bearing downgraded because of money? I have never had a problem with the Vintage needle bearing, I have never had a problem with needle bearing in any of the new edition motor. I will post several photos to show what I found.
Have fun,
The original Whizzer company supported the right side of the crankshaft with a Torrington needle bearing mounted in the sidecover. The WC-1 new edition motor used a similar needle bearing. The NE motors sported a new sidecover that was thicker so that allen screws could be used to attach it to the crankcase. The original Whizzer used different thickness spacers to keep the crankshaft centered, the new company didn't make any provisions to keep it centered. Often on the new generation motors the crankshaft will move sideways, but usually isn't a real serious problem [unless you are running at "Bonneville"].
I have 3 motors on my bench from owners to rebuild. One is a WC-1 with a Westman cylinder, and the crankshaft is "solid". The second motor is a 2006 NE, and the crankshaft moves approx. 1/8" side to side. The third motor is a 2008 NE, and the crankshaft "wobbles" and moves from side to side approx. 3/8". The play on the 2008 was way too much, so I removed the side cover to see what I needed to do, and to my surprize, the German needle bearing wasn't there, instead a #6904 ball bearing was mounted in the side cover. The bearing was so loose in the cover it fell out when I turned the cover over.
I was still in shock that the quality needle bearing had been replaced with thin ball bearing. I quickly located my bearing book and looked up the number, sadly here are the facts. The bearing is called an "Extremely Light Plain Ball Bearing" and has a very, very, very low rating of 1824 @ 1000 RPMs. The original needle bearing is 12 MM wide, whereas the replacement is only 9 MM wide. Not only is the new bearing much thinner, but it is recessed deeply into the side cover. They also located 4 washers on the end of the crankshaft to help make up the extra space, but only a part of the crankshaft rides inside the bearing [very little support]. The earlier NE motors that used the needle bearing enjoyed complete crankshaft support and a bearing that was rated with a load capacity of 12100 [static], about 15 times better than the current ball bearing.
Was the bearing downgraded because of money? I have never had a problem with the Vintage needle bearing, I have never had a problem with needle bearing in any of the new edition motor. I will post several photos to show what I found.
Have fun,
Attachments
Last edited: