indeed, silverbear, all valid points & concerns, sociologically but not necessarily legally...but you grew up in a time when you were responsible for your own mistakes, and your riding style reflects that. you're not bothering anyone i believe that, but be assured many riders ARE bothering folks. nowadays, when people see our freedom-machines, they see yet-another insurance-liability. sorry, but from that standpoint, altho i'm hardcore MB, i have to agree we need to find a way to do our part. i wonder how the few early MN riders felt when stricter laws emerged, did they blame someone else or take self-responsibility? no telling of course, but i think you get my drift...
who are we to thumb our noses when we should be doing everything we can, as a group, to ensure tomorrow's rider (your customers & friends) CAN ride?
btw-i use a 40cc that outruns most stock HT's...so we really have to get over this "bigger is better" stuff as a just plain invalid argument<---only my opinion of course, but we're talking about "motor-assisted-bicycles" and not unsafe/underbuilt motorcycles-with-pedals...
yes only my opinion and i respect yours too...and i won't further muddy up the legal topic with debate...
but i will repeat: if you're gonna publicly brag about using illegal equipment & producing sworn legal documents with untrue specifications, then don't complain next year when they tighten up on you even more than they already have.
for real, i'm on your side in this battle, but i have to wonder just how smart some of our "soldiers" are...
i too am very interested in how one properly documents and insures our contraptions in Minnesota...and i hope to eventually see responsible examples presented here so all can benefit
who are we to thumb our noses when we should be doing everything we can, as a group, to ensure tomorrow's rider (your customers & friends) CAN ride?
btw-i use a 40cc that outruns most stock HT's...so we really have to get over this "bigger is better" stuff as a just plain invalid argument<---only my opinion of course, but we're talking about "motor-assisted-bicycles" and not unsafe/underbuilt motorcycles-with-pedals...
yes only my opinion and i respect yours too...and i won't further muddy up the legal topic with debate...
but i will repeat: if you're gonna publicly brag about using illegal equipment & producing sworn legal documents with untrue specifications, then don't complain next year when they tighten up on you even more than they already have.
for real, i'm on your side in this battle, but i have to wonder just how smart some of our "soldiers" are...
i too am very interested in how one properly documents and insures our contraptions in Minnesota...and i hope to eventually see responsible examples presented here so all can benefit
Last edited: