20 years ago, my high school did not care if you rode an MB to school or not. I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if they do nowadays. Of course nowadays an MB would be stolen from a school bicycle corral in half a New York second.
Personally I think the Bumble Bee looks really interesting and well thought out.
However, I tend to get the willies when I read instructions like "make sure the mounting bolt is tight about 50 lbs torque per sq inch." Torque doesn't come in pounds per square inch and it makes me wonder if the author has a firm grasp on the mechanical principles required to design and build a bike motor mount that won't come apart at speed.
I've been in a few other non bike related forums, not gonna get in a flame throwing match. Respectfully, I KNOW these things won't come apart. OK, the proper english is not used in their paperwork, I bet folks understand anyway. I've logged countless hours. Consumers will not be let down, as long as they use oil in the gas...this is the only way you don't get your money's worth.
I "think" they meant to say in./lbs. or ft./lbs.,
You're making the same mistake with ft./lbs. That slash "/" means "divided by." It's not "feet divided by pounds", it's "feet TIMES pounds."
Does it make a difference? Well, 20/10=2. 20x10=200. 2 or 200, yeah, that's a big difference in my book.
Speed is miles/hour or miles per hour - miles divided by hours. You went 60 miles in 3 hours, you went 20 miles per hour. 60/3=20.
Torque is lever length TIMES force. You have a 2 ft. lever and you pushed on it with 6 lbs., that equals 12 ft.-lbs. Because 2x6=12. Pronounced "foot-pounds." Also sometimes written as pound-feet.
Sorry, but it really bothers me that someone who is designing and building something mechanical that can hurt me if it fails can't tell the difference between "times X" and "divided by X." Because the difference between 2 or 200 makes a difference.