extended intake for more low end power

Discussion in 'Performance Mods' started by jaguar, Jan 15, 2011.

  1. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    http://2stroker.net/jennings/crankcase_volume.pdf shows how 6.3 and 10.3 inch intake lengths (from inside of cylinder to carb slide) can boost power by 15% between 1800 and 3300 rpm. The power boost is over what is had with a 4.3" inlet. Stock is around 3.5".

    Gordon Jennings, in his 2 Stoke Performance Tuning book, wrote "My friends at McCulloch, who acquainted me with the stub-exhaust testing technique, tell of tests they have performed with an engine having an intake period of 120-degrees, and with pipes ranging from 5- to 9 1/2-inches in length. They were able to move the power peak anywhere from 3000 rpm to 8000 rpm. The 9 1/2-inch length gave substantially the same power at 3000 rpm and 4000 rpm; at 5000 rpm, an 8 1/2-inch was best; at 6000 rpm and 7000 rpm the same power could be had with either a 9 1/2- or 6 1/2-inch length; and the same was true at 8000 rpm, but with lengths of 5 1/2 and 8-inches. From these tests, it was determined that the best compromise length for the entire range 3000-8000 rpm was 8-inches; a 5 1/2inch length was slightly better for the range 6000-8000 rpm. It should be understood that these lengths only apply to this specific example, and would vary with any changes in intake timing, crankcase volume and intake tract diameter."


    I experimented with different lengths on my bike and ended up with 8.5" (total intake length) as the most optimum. Look at this drawing to see what I did:
     

    Attached Files:


  2. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    Graphs

    Here is a graph from the quoted research paper. The "tuned" length is what worked best with the engine they were experimenting with. For mine the tuned length is 8.5".
     

    Attached Files:

  3. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    I can climb inclined streets now that I had to pedal up before. I am very happy with this mod and highly recommend it if you want more torque.
     
  4. DuctTapedGoat

    DuctTapedGoat Member

    Wow Jag, I didn't even consider this! Nice. This in combination with an expansion chamber would really let you get some sick tuning options.
     
  5. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    tuned intake and exhaust

    Yes and no. An expansion chamber tuned for low rpm power is very long, around 85" which is why there are no low-rpm pipes available. You'd have to make your own. If you did that then yes you could have a torque monster. Figure 6 of http://2stroker.net/jennings/crankcase_volume.pdf shows that there's an additional 15% boost to be had when the exhaust is "tuned" (correct for the intended rpm range). So the two together show yield around a 30% gain!
     

    Attached Files:

    • pipe.jpg
      pipe.jpg
      File size:
      36.9 KB
      Views:
      589
  6. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    I bought a 58cc top end (which is ported better for low rpm power) and tested it on inclined streets. One was climbed at 11mph. After adding the intake extender I climbed it at 17mph!
    Jennings reported that the power gains between a reed valve and an intake extension were about the same at rpm's under 3000.
     
    Last edited: Jan 26, 2011
  7. Three-Wire

    Three-Wire New Member

    How did you support the carb after adding the rubber hose manifold extension?
     
  8. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    I used a long zip tie connected to the frame, but really hardly any support was needed because the hose was sufficiently stiff. I've rode it like that without the zip tie and it was fine.
     
  9. DuctTapedGoat

    DuctTapedGoat Member

    If you use threaded hose clamps you really won't need to worry about it slipping.
     
  10. Drylakerunner85

    Drylakerunner85 New Member

    Its a beast all over! wahaha!!! :jester:

    [​IMG]
     
  11. jaguar

    jaguar Well-Known Member

    Pipe length

    Did you know that the exhaust pipe length affects power also?
    Look at this graph plotting changes in delivery ratio (.8 means the cylinder is filled 80% with air/fuel mixture which equates to engine power) and pipe length. It's from the same crankcase_volume pdf.
    I measured my stock pipe to be 9" from cylinder to muffler.
    Between 30 and 40 inches really boosts the delivery ratio for mid-range rpms and probably 20 inches would be best for high rpm power.
    I'm going to start experimenting on pipes.
    Also some airplane engines utilize straight pipes that slowly taper outward. They supposedly give the best power over the whole spread of engine rpms.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. A-TownTX

    A-TownTX Member

    cool

    I like that exhaust Drylake
     
  13. Drylakerunner85

    Drylakerunner85 New Member

    :evilgrin: Thanks! haha it made me go deff
     
  14. Drylakerunner85

    Drylakerunner85 New Member

    Here is the new intake manifold built by the man him self from venicemotorbikes

    [​IMG]
     
Loading...