H
HoughMade
Guest
I understand your point Mike.
But I guess Augi's point...if that is his point, about the "clones" and the Titan is a good one. I too am curious about the documentation that these engines are EPA compliant (as the CARB doesn't mean much to me from 2,000 miles away).
The Honda has (very) slightly more displacement, appears to run a little higher compression and allows a higher rpm. RPM makes a big difference in output.
[edit]
What I do know is that often the maker of a "clone" engine is allowed to piggyback on the certification received by the engine that "inspired" their design....and if that's the case ere, let's hear it...and then explain how different these engines can really be and bootstrap on Honda's dime.
But I guess Augi's point...if that is his point, about the "clones" and the Titan is a good one. I too am curious about the documentation that these engines are EPA compliant (as the CARB doesn't mean much to me from 2,000 miles away).
The Honda has (very) slightly more displacement, appears to run a little higher compression and allows a higher rpm. RPM makes a big difference in output.
[edit]
What I do know is that often the maker of a "clone" engine is allowed to piggyback on the certification received by the engine that "inspired" their design....and if that's the case ere, let's hear it...and then explain how different these engines can really be and bootstrap on Honda's dime.
Last edited by a moderator: