M
MotorbikeMike
Guest
Back to the Point at Hand
HI, ok guys, so we have looked into the twisted world of the 49CC YES My new Honda arrived and the GX50 is clearly marked 49cc (very unimportant in some parts of the world).
Apparently the T I T A N has NO true factory specs, because none were ever found? No matter as I have no desire to be involved with tiny Chinese centrifugal clutches, as I see that are part of that engine. I NEED an output shaft, and 5/8 is VERY universal. Do they have a 5/8 shaft type model?
Come on now, how many of you guys would REALLY line up to say that a Chinese clone will be as good as a Honda? Do you really think the metallurgy is as good on a CH-Clone as it would be from a Japanese automobile, and motorcycle manufacturer?
Ok on another point IF the HS actually WAS 2.5, wouldn't they be bragging about it in their specs? AND conversely, if the Honda were not, would they risk their reputation on untruth?
The High RPM myth, look at the HP chart on the Honda, it develops the HP way before red line.
My little Honda does have a bunch of relevant smog info on it also, and a "fuel mileage comparison" similar to electrical appliances.
I will be the first to agree that the HS seems like a good little engine, and that there is room for the less-expensive model, and the more pricey Honda in the Scheme of things.
I will be happily testing both engines, tho I find myself in need of another baseplate, and muffler to be fair, I intend (in my secret laboratory) to build 2 bikes, so that the test will be fair.
Initially I will remove the ailing JL Hoot box and HS engine, and replace it with a 2ND gen Grube box and the little Honda. I am aware of the final drive sprocket differences, tho I will need to count the teeth on the boxes (unless someone has the true reduction ratios).
BTW the only thing wrong with the HS engine, is the gas is old, and I need to try the other engine on that baseplate (till I locate, or build another).
I believe that the HS is adequate, but predict that I will see greatly improved performance from the Honda.
Hey, BTW the muffler on the kit I got was a 2-stroke muffler, and it discolored almost immediately from the excess heat of the back pressure from that COMPLETELY wrong, ill-conceived muffler, this I will fix easily.
General 4-stroke Muffler info..... 4-stroke engines use a head-pipe that is usually MUCH larger than the exhaust valve, and attempt to introduce little to NO back-pressure. For a reference, look at ANY engineered single-cylinder 4-stroke, whether the Honda, a Briggs, or small motorcycle.
Not a bad looking pipe, but a very poor performing one.
NOW, please respond at will to the post, BUT, a new twist:
What do you like the MOST about your little 50cc in-frame 4-stroke.
AND
What do you like the least about your little 50cc in-frame 4-stroke.
We march on!
HI, ok guys, so we have looked into the twisted world of the 49CC YES My new Honda arrived and the GX50 is clearly marked 49cc (very unimportant in some parts of the world).
Apparently the T I T A N has NO true factory specs, because none were ever found? No matter as I have no desire to be involved with tiny Chinese centrifugal clutches, as I see that are part of that engine. I NEED an output shaft, and 5/8 is VERY universal. Do they have a 5/8 shaft type model?
Come on now, how many of you guys would REALLY line up to say that a Chinese clone will be as good as a Honda? Do you really think the metallurgy is as good on a CH-Clone as it would be from a Japanese automobile, and motorcycle manufacturer?
Ok on another point IF the HS actually WAS 2.5, wouldn't they be bragging about it in their specs? AND conversely, if the Honda were not, would they risk their reputation on untruth?
The High RPM myth, look at the HP chart on the Honda, it develops the HP way before red line.
My little Honda does have a bunch of relevant smog info on it also, and a "fuel mileage comparison" similar to electrical appliances.
I will be the first to agree that the HS seems like a good little engine, and that there is room for the less-expensive model, and the more pricey Honda in the Scheme of things.
I will be happily testing both engines, tho I find myself in need of another baseplate, and muffler to be fair, I intend (in my secret laboratory) to build 2 bikes, so that the test will be fair.
Initially I will remove the ailing JL Hoot box and HS engine, and replace it with a 2ND gen Grube box and the little Honda. I am aware of the final drive sprocket differences, tho I will need to count the teeth on the boxes (unless someone has the true reduction ratios).
BTW the only thing wrong with the HS engine, is the gas is old, and I need to try the other engine on that baseplate (till I locate, or build another).
I believe that the HS is adequate, but predict that I will see greatly improved performance from the Honda.
Hey, BTW the muffler on the kit I got was a 2-stroke muffler, and it discolored almost immediately from the excess heat of the back pressure from that COMPLETELY wrong, ill-conceived muffler, this I will fix easily.
General 4-stroke Muffler info..... 4-stroke engines use a head-pipe that is usually MUCH larger than the exhaust valve, and attempt to introduce little to NO back-pressure. For a reference, look at ANY engineered single-cylinder 4-stroke, whether the Honda, a Briggs, or small motorcycle.
Not a bad looking pipe, but a very poor performing one.
NOW, please respond at will to the post, BUT, a new twist:
What do you like the MOST about your little 50cc in-frame 4-stroke.
AND
What do you like the least about your little 50cc in-frame 4-stroke.
We march on!