Calling someone cognitively challenged is not tantamount to wishing him dead,please try to comprehend plain English.I considered your kind of activities unsafe,I cautioned you,and ventured to tell you that if you came to harm because of that,it would be no great loss to mankind in view on your apparent disregard for the safety of others.
As far as creativity goes,instead of slapping oversize engines onto bicycles,why not,for instance look into aerodynamically efficient fairings etc,to improve efficiency.That would be a worthwhile endeavor,in the spirit of efficient personal transportation.You can hardly expect me to have a positive attitude about activities which in my opinion are detrimental to the cause of MB,and which could lead to unwelcome interest by the LAW
As far as Mr Macarallo goes,I was concerned about his safety,so I was "faking"that, to berate him for conduct unbecoming an expectant father.It's irresponsible to go joy riding at 50mph with a design ? that I (and others) WARNED him about as a candidate for structural failure.And it failed,he was lucky.Trial and error is OK if that's the only way to proceed,otherwise listen to those with knowledge and experience and don't use the public roads as a test bed for reckless experiments.Your concept of freedom is apparently just to do as you **** well please,go to India,Egypt or Brazil,these places should be to your liking,hectic,dangerous and pretty much lawless.(as far as traffic is concerned)