scott.d.lang
New Member
it will be nice to see some dyno runs all I can go by is seat of my pants and the differences I see in my gps on speed lol.
where is yours?Scott said "I knew about that 2 months before".
what is "that"?
Why doesnt the HD maker give any details besides childish hype?
Huffy, I have many pages explaining this technical subject and showing relative timing graphs based on observations using a timing light.
You have nothing.
And you have the bold-faced arrogance to say that long held standards for digital CDIs for racing engines is "unnecessary". wow! you are incredible, but not in a good way.
You talk about the importance of using 1% resistors and closer tolerance capacitors. Huffy (big bad wolf), only if the design were "set" at the absolute best RC values would that be important. With an adjustable design it is perfectly fine to use 5% resistors and polyester charge capacitors. I have experimented with capacitor values plus and minus 20% of 1uf with no noticable difference observed.
You copy my design, use tighter tolerance RC components (totally unnecessary), use a lower value capacitor in the timing portion (as per my advice in a former post) for high rpm engines, and then in a way to cover the fact that I have made another design breakthrough that is beyond your comprehension you say the last portion of the timing curve which more closely approximates a digital CDI is "unnecessary".
Anyone reading this can easily see what the score is. Smart guy 1, dumb copycat 0.
How nice of you to admit your just a copycatI copied a Kawasaki CDI and made some changes to it for use with this engine.