ZnsaneRyder
Member
- Local time
- 3:18 PM
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 805
Many of us at MBc, if not most of us have what's called an "80cc" engine on our bicycles. By what I have gathered here, the "80cc" is much more in demand than the 49cc by far. It seems actually few are under 50cc.
Also, what that means is most motoredbicycles are over the engine cc limit of many jurisdictions. What would you do if some cops caught on to that? There's many "80cc" being faked as 49cc. I'm still sure they cannot prove the cc's of the engine with what tools they have available.
However, I have an idea. What if more laws supported 80cc engines? I know it's not changing soon, or anything, but I wanted to bring up a conversation topic.
Also to add, I'm sure you could even take an 80cc engine and de-stroke it down to 50cc, which proves you cannot tell the displacement difference from the outside.
In your opinion, Is it better to get the law to support the most common size of bicycle engine, or is it better to pass them off as 49cc since there's really no way to tell the difference?
Also, what that means is most motoredbicycles are over the engine cc limit of many jurisdictions. What would you do if some cops caught on to that? There's many "80cc" being faked as 49cc. I'm still sure they cannot prove the cc's of the engine with what tools they have available.
However, I have an idea. What if more laws supported 80cc engines? I know it's not changing soon, or anything, but I wanted to bring up a conversation topic.
Also to add, I'm sure you could even take an 80cc engine and de-stroke it down to 50cc, which proves you cannot tell the displacement difference from the outside.
In your opinion, Is it better to get the law to support the most common size of bicycle engine, or is it better to pass them off as 49cc since there's really no way to tell the difference?