Ebike Motors: A Political and Historical View

Ebike Manufacturer vs Ebike User

I want to make this point clear...

You have to separate out my own actions as a private citizen riding my ebike around verses my business intentions. I might personally do things that are wild and crazy, but the other half of what I'm into is the potential of a business side to all of this.

Don't define my product by my own behavior as a citizen, they are not the same.

--------------------------

Scenerio One : Product is a Success

Okay, let's say that "someone" gets into the ebike parts or complete bike building business. The product that they sell is not compliant with the Federal Ebike Law and it also does not comply with any state laws. However, due to the low volumes of initial sales the law doesn't take much notice initially. The business starts to turn a profit and you decide to ramp up production to expand your profits. Eventually the law DOES catch up with you and sees that your product is not legal anywhere and shuts down your operation. You have now lost all your investment and what looked like success is now failure.

Scenario Two : Product causes Injury

In this scenario you are building and selling your product and the law hasn't noticed you directly. But instead of the law coming to you, you end up being forced into the arms of lawyers as someone who purchased your product is now paralyzed in a nasty accident. The grieving mother of the 16 year old boy has filed a lawsuit that claims that since your product is completely illegal and has no legal protection whatsoever that it's worth at least a million dollars "to set an example" to others that so flagrantly defy the laws. In this scenario you thought things were going great until you are completely busted. (and you lose your house too)

...one way or the other the business has a bad end.

Scenario Three : Keep It Legal

In this scenario you satisfy the letter of the law, but take enough liberties so that people still find your product attractive. You choose a motor that maximizes the 750 watts allowed in the optimal way. You create a bike that the user can modify if they so choose. The result is that if you win you win or if you lose you lose, but there is no legal worry hanging over your operation. You even sleep well at night.
 
Last edited:
Why the big deal about intentions? Matt has never claimed to sell anything that fits the ebike laws, he has never given guidance that his bikes are for legal road use, and you are completely focused on what he builds for sale.

And then you say this?!?!?

Safe:
Speed is an issue... ideally I'd prefer to build a bike with some kind of speed limiter built in that people could remove and violate the law themselves.


So you are going to build a legal product that is INTENTIONALLY built so that it can be make illegal by the user?

Hello kettle, this is pot!!
 
So you are going to build a legal product that is INTENTIONALLY built so that it can be made illegal by the user?

Yes... that's the whole idea...

You sell something that is somehow crippled so that it just barely satisfies the laws, then let people go about modifying it afterwards. Maybe someone like Recumpence wants to be the guy that does the "drug dealing", but I'm going to do everything possible to be legitimate if I actually am going to place money into it.

Aftermarket products tend to have low volumes and the law just doesn't crack down on everything... they can't... they have limited resources.

In some ways it's a good thing to have brave people like Recumpence out there willing to take the chances. But when it comes to advocacy I have to say that "we" collectively need to have some realization of the illegality of what is going on.

Drug dealers might be "cool" in some crowds, but they are still peddling an illegal product...

(it's a rough metaphor, but it fits pretty well)
 
Last edited:
Since you are not aware, I will let you in on it. Matt has amp limiting boxes that can turn the power down as much as is wanted. I am also producing a RC style controller with built in amp limiting functions, so all is not lost in legal bike land.

But show me where he is selling these as street legal kits or builds? I know the buyer of the bmx project is well aware of the legality of his new toy.


So using your own drug dealer analogy:

Matt is selling paint, and does not check how his customers use it. It is only illegal when improperly used, right?

You are selling paint and telling your clients how to huff it. You will provide the gold paint, the bag, and handy instructions on how to best get your high. Sure you don't HAVE to huff it, but at least the customer knows they can.
 
Like I said in the previous posting... it's probably okay if there's a little aftermarket mischief going on. The problem arises when you want to be in business doing this stuff and you are faced with the fact that if you get too big the government is going to crack down on you.

I'm just saying that we need to remind ourselves that "a little bit illegal" is okay, but sometimes it's going too far.

18 hp on a bicycle is too far. (in my opinion)

This is true whether it's using an Etek, PMG132 or a set of RC motors.
 
I had a moped when I was a kid, and the dealer that sold me the bike told me how to "de-restrict" the engine for more power. It seems that our government had limitied the power output of the engine, but the engine was capable of quite a bit more in its domestic market in Europe. The bike was sure a lot more fun, and more safe (IMO) because of the extra speed and power.
 
I have to make a few things abundantly clear;

#1 At what point are you EVER going to market anything? I have been listening to you whine for a year and a half and nothing has yet materialized.

#2 At what point are you going to get it through your head that no-one is marching to your drum? You have been banging this "EBRR" garbage at every possible point as far as I can remember and VERY few people even think its cool, let alone are building one to somehow compete in your racing class that will ever be.

#3 I am not trying to market anything in mass quantities. However, I have been approached by 6 bicycle manufacturers about marketting a system based on my designs. We discussed adhering to laws and what-not. No problem. How many manufacturers have approached YOU for a design?

#4 You, yourself, said you purposely break the law with your ebikes "What I do as a private citizen is not the same as what my business intentions are." So, who's the crack dealer? Show me where I am trying to get others to break the law?

Safe, I have defended you, I have followed your builds, and I have put up with your strangeness. However, at this point, you are on my last nerve. You will not ever realize how hoplessly rude and misguided you are.

You used to whine about certain individuals who would post on your threads and give you a hard time. At this point, I am telling you to stay off my threads, PERIOD. I can take constructive criticism about some technical aspect of my builds. However, I will NOT take garbage from you about my intentions (like you have any clue what they are anyway).

STAY OFF MY THREADS!

Matt
 
Well this is why I created this thread to specifically deal with the issue of illegal ebike motors.

As far as my own efforts... production of anything requires that I've actually completed the thinking about what market the product is supposed to fill and how to do it. I'm nowhere near even getting a prototype completed. I'm hoping that over the years my hobby can continue to evolve and at some point I actually get something worth the risk of producing... but then again it might never happen and remain as a hobby.

Recumpence...

You are free to sell you product... it's not like I'm going to narc on you now and call up the police to get you shut down. However, if I WAS your competitor and if I WAS selling an actual product and my money was on the line, then you better believe I'd get the police on your case. Not doing so would not be smart on my part.

Competition in the marketplace means that if I can get my competitor arrested or shut down for being illegal then I'm naturally going to do it.

In business they use the law to their advantage whenever possible. Lawyers and business are pretty much inseparable these days... just the reality that's all... "word to the wise" so to speak...

zidane%20red%20card%20horiz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Your product undermines my efforts to try to get a 1000 watt racing class started. You have to figure that I'm going to object... I mean be realistic... if my whole project revolves around 1000 watt racing and you come along with something that allows someone to take an ordinary bike with no fairing, no performance oriented handling for high speed or anything like that and by adding your product it makes something of legal power levels look boring then I'm naturally going to object.

What are my choices?

:D I can abandon the legal concept I've been working towards for the last three years and go along with the "arms race" by building a Road Racer bike that would not be allowed anywhere because of excessive power.

or:

:D I can stick to my guns and stay legal and do my best to deter people from getting into the illegal stuff.

----------------------

What I'm thinking for the Induction motor is that the power input level is set at a constant of 1000 watts and then the speed limit is set by the frequency that is permitted at full throttle. It's a natural built in speed limiting mechanism. For the racing version you swap out the chip that limits the frequency and allow the motor to rev higher. If someone tries to simply change the gearing to higher gearing they lose their bottom end power, so there would be a big advantage to properly upgrading to the racing chip.

Anyway... that's my line of thinking... it's not "raw power", but subtle improvements on legal power.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top