Frankenstein
Deceased - Frankenstein 1991 - 2018
- Local time
- 3:11 AM
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2016
- Messages
- 5,035
Well the bearings will probably fail first if you keep the chain lubricated and don't use cheap chain, the cheaper the faster the stretch and the quicker you loose sprockets to wear.Thank you for all the tips here.
I want to start after my first reduction because I don't want to build a full transmission box with two shafts, I love my 4G transmission and I would like to keep it and just adding 1 more shaft (the jackshaft), will add less power loss (bearing, chains, etc).
Let me give you some of the calculations I've being doing, having you telling me what can fail based on your experience is priceless:
HS motor has an engagement RPM of 3k and a max RPM of ~6.8k, so the output shaft of the 4G transmission will spin at ~750 RPM when main clutch engages and at ~1700 RPM at full throttle.
My idea is getting a clutch that engages at ~1200 RPM and install it on the output shaft of the 4G, based on your affirmation that lockup happens aprox 1.3 RPM later than engagement, it will lockup at ~1560 RPM. First speed will run from 750 to 1200 RPM, transition between 1200 and 1560 RPM and second speed from 1560 to 1700 RPM. Max torque is at 4500 RPM on the motor, 1125 RPM on the shaft.
Now talking about the two gears, the first one will be around 3:1 reduction and the second 2:1 reduction, still doing numbers bout this.
Talking about speeds, right now I do 29mph with a total reduction of 8:1 (40T sprocket), second speed has exactly that reduction ratio, so I expect the max speed to be a little bit lower, due to more chains and bearing, but will be a good test to see how much power is being lost on the jackshaft. First speed will be like having a 50T sprocket (9:1 reduction), I didn't try that sprocket, but I tried a 44T and it was quite quick.
You will need 2 shafts or you will need to press the 4g shaft out and put a longer one to accept the extra hardware, you basically illustrated that on the first page however so I think you understand that.
The idea you are presenting is sound and has been demonstrated as a working idea, if you build it true then you won't have a problem, just use quality parts, I would suggest an adjustable rail or swinging hinge to remove slack in the chains without adding the friction or additional complications of 2 idler pulleys along with a third on the final drive.