OCCStingray
Member
ran darn good right up until its final wheelie. was actually still running on that junk..
there I do believe I have explained myself.
Nuf said. Well done haha.
ran darn good right up until its final wheelie. was actually still running on that junk..
there I do believe I have explained myself.
I have looked at your product before but not found as much comprehensive info as id of liked.
I actually like the stock cdi advance for power sake now that I have gotten to see it, though I wish it had a stronger spark charge which I believe to be its main downfall.
to jag: do you make a kit with heightened spark with more aggressive timing curves?
as im redoing the top end I cam across this which is really interesting. these new style cylinder jugs can be very questionable - here is the video comparison (motorized bike jug good vs bad)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55BbALTGlzM
on an otherwise stock engine with a low compression head you won't see any performance or reliability gains with an aftermarket CDI.
You are both right and completely wrong.
I will agree that on a standard engine, you will see little performance gain with a Jaguar CDI (just like you see virtually no performance gain by changing carburettors) but you will see a significant improvement in engine life by installing a Jaguar CDI.
Ignition timing isn't that big of a deal.
The "Jaguar CDI" is unfortunately not typically a cost-effective proposition with these 2-stroke HT engines.
1800 miles is excellent for a 2-stroke engine top-end, especially one as poorly manufactured as a HT.
I would rebuild the top-end every 1000 miles just to be on the safe side regardless of CDI.
The Jag CDI is not a panacea for poor quality internals.
The Jag CDI [is...] an expensive ingredient at that!