D
Deleted member 12676
Guest
There has been controversy on this subject and being open minded and wanting to explore every possibility for power gain I decided to research it myself.
Looking for more mid-range power I installed a home-made boost bottle made of PVC. Area was 86cc (3.14 x L x radius squared) which was more than the believed-to-be-ideal of making it the same size of your combustion area (60cc). Reading about it some people said it was good for low end power if size-tuned for the rpm range you want. Others said it didn't work. I suppose they utilized too small an inner hose diameter because the original research from Yamaha said it needed to be the same diameter as the carb. My first one had 4.8mm (3/16") as smallest passageway diameter. It made the idle stronger, no noticable difference in power, made the top speed 2mph less. So then I tripled the passageway area by increasing the inner diameter to 8.6mm (11/32") and I didn't notice any power difference but it seemed to be too lean at idle, taking a long time to settle to a low rpm after blipping the throttle. Theoretically that made sense because the bottle prevents as much back flow thru the carb, thereby not letting it enrichen the mixture as much. So I would need to go up two numbers on the Dellorto jet. From that experience and reading the stories of others I believe it might make a small enough difference when climbing a street at low rpm. Unfortunately I now live where everything is flat and so if I don't feel increased acceleration then I assume it doesn't make a big enough difference. Maybe if I was back in Cuenca where the streets are hilly I could correctly test it.
If you live where there's inclined streets then please throw in your two cents worth if you did a before and after boost bottle test.
Looking for more mid-range power I installed a home-made boost bottle made of PVC. Area was 86cc (3.14 x L x radius squared) which was more than the believed-to-be-ideal of making it the same size of your combustion area (60cc). Reading about it some people said it was good for low end power if size-tuned for the rpm range you want. Others said it didn't work. I suppose they utilized too small an inner hose diameter because the original research from Yamaha said it needed to be the same diameter as the carb. My first one had 4.8mm (3/16") as smallest passageway diameter. It made the idle stronger, no noticable difference in power, made the top speed 2mph less. So then I tripled the passageway area by increasing the inner diameter to 8.6mm (11/32") and I didn't notice any power difference but it seemed to be too lean at idle, taking a long time to settle to a low rpm after blipping the throttle. Theoretically that made sense because the bottle prevents as much back flow thru the carb, thereby not letting it enrichen the mixture as much. So I would need to go up two numbers on the Dellorto jet. From that experience and reading the stories of others I believe it might make a small enough difference when climbing a street at low rpm. Unfortunately I now live where everything is flat and so if I don't feel increased acceleration then I assume it doesn't make a big enough difference. Maybe if I was back in Cuenca where the streets are hilly I could correctly test it.
If you live where there's inclined streets then please throw in your two cents worth if you did a before and after boost bottle test.