FurryOnTheInside
In Memoriam
I almost wish I hadn't mentioned that I pedal along with my engine because it's a bit off topic. The OP only said that he wants to be able to make use of his gears when his engine is not running. It just so happens that I can (and do) do both.The question you have to ask yourself is if the act of creating that extra 10% power cancels itself out in other ways. Bear in mind a couple of things. We know that adding small ammounts of power has diminishing returns because aerodynamic drag increases in a nasty way. The increase in drag from say, 15mph to 20 mph is more than it was from 10 to 15, and so on.
Now remember we suffer this effect much more than we're used to thinking about, because a bike with a rider is just about the least aerodynamic thing. A brick with rounded edges would do better.
Now start pedaling fast, and suddenly that extremely unaerodynamic object has gotten even worse. It won't even stay the same shape, so the drag goes crazy. If you ever watch cycling on TV when they're going down a mountain, you'll notice they stop pedaling and put their feet level at 9 and 3 on the crank. Their speed is entirely within their gear range, but they stop anyway, because the aerodynamics mean powering themselves would be slower than just tucking in and letting gravity do the work.
The top speed of a decent ported out motor with the vibration taken care of is what, 40mph according to your own figures? That's well in the speed range where trying to assist the engine is just pointless behavior.
As for chains dropping on a 1x, I have to say that yeah sometimes they drop, and sometimes wheels fall off too. I don't have special wheel-holder oners though because I know that'd be an exceptional situation. Tighten your wheelnuts, make sure your chainring isn't bent and stop worrying.
On smooth paved flat ground the aerodynamic drag increases to the square of the speed, but the power required to overcome aerodynamic drag increases to the cube of the speed.
On flat ground 10% extra power from engine mods is not going to yield a huge difference to the top speed..
(bikecalculator.com)
254lb rider, 66lb motorised mountain bike, 0% gradient,
2000W = ~40.88mph
2200W= ~42.36mph
That's 3.62% faster.
However if you are accelerating or climbing, the extra power will be far more noticeable. An extra 10% power can yield close to a 10% increase in the climbing speed of the bike if the gradient is steep enough (>20% gradient).
Accelerating is similar to climbing.
(bikecalculator.com)
A 254lb rider, on a 66lb motorised mountain bike, on a 20% gradient,
2000W= ~13.66mph.
2200W= ~14.93mph.
That's 9.29% faster.
But I just pedal along with my engine because it feels natural and I enjoy it, and it's less embarrassing for me as a fat guy (I'd hate to look lazy as well as fat!).
It does also accelerate and climb faster and it keeps me warm.
40mph isn't my top speed. I have not found my top speed yet. I have been up to 8000rpm (around 37mph).
I might have a go at finding my top speed after I change the rear sprocket because I don't particularly want to go above 8000rpm.
I can only pedal until around 36-37mph anyway so I cannot test whether my top speed is increased by pedalling.
Last edited: