We are all motorists.
All motors do our hard work for us.
Don't be a motoracist here please.
Remember we are here to post respectable content to contribute to our hobby and our world, and to help each other to motorise bikes.
Example:
I wont go back to the 410 or larger chains.
I don't believe that the
strength was the thing that had kept it from malfunctioning, but rather other factors in
its design and
my specific system of controlling movement and forces upon it. I decided that it doesn't need to be so burly, for my bike. So I added lightness!
In support of the Quicklink:
Quicklinks join in a way that slots together and wedges pretty nicely, in my experience.
They are newer technology so some people might not have tried them on any type of bike. They're not intended for a motorised application, but that doesn't mean you cant try.
Quicklinks are only found on
modern day market leader modern brand multiple speed chains, so they undeniably have state-of-the-art design, metallurgy and manufacturing techniques.
In my experience they are reliable and last well enough to have a
load of fun or transport (and fun from playing with nice tech) and get real benefit! They have smooth sides and non-protruding pins so they won't catch on anything, like any guides you've built into your chain management system.
Quicklinks are tiny and instantly replaceable. They can be removed with your shoelace. They can be rejoined with no tools. They can be re-joined a few times I believe, but imho unless you are operating some kind of uncommon practices (such as needing to alter the chain length mid-ride to fit alternative sprockets) you don't need to reuse them.
Of course if you fit a multiple speed chain to motorised bicycle there are then other serious concerns that you must address, about lateral flexibility, particularly in hard terrain use.