crank mod, removing material

JerboaJohn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
1,130
what would happen after I've balanced the crank to the piston and removed some material on the lathe?. it'd be equal all the way around, that's what the lathe does in circles. I'd probably do the sides so I could fill in with JB not to increase the case volume. but just wondering, how much weight does it really need? lighter is faster, right?
 


C

coolki

Guest
what would happen after I've balanced the crank to the piston and removed some material on the lathe?. it'd be equal all the way around, that's what the lathe does in circles. I'd probably do the sides so I could fill in with JB not to increase the case volume. but just wondering, how much weight does it really need? lighter is faster, right?
depends on how much materail is being removed, were talking mere grams.
it would probalby spin up faster as theres less wieght on the crankshaft.
honestly the best thing to do is balence it, if your talking about the 66cc engines.
 

dparenti13

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
119
I'm kinda just guessing here, but physics tells me less weight = less rotational inertia to overcome, so it might rev easier? Kinda like a lightened flywheel? I could be wrong...
 

Street Ryderz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
3,007
I'm kinda just guessing here, but physics tells me less weight = less rotational inertia to overcome, so it might rev easier? Kinda like a lightened flywheel? I could be wrong...
Less rotational mass will spin up faster with no load but under load that inertia is needed to over come the compression and driven load,It will also turn less top rpm due to the loss of inertia/mass.I've balanced a crank that completly off set the reciprocating mass and it was a dog,at 50% there is some loss but very smooth 30-40% works best IMO and puts the sweet spot up high.Matching the sweet spot to the pipe staging allows safer high rpm use and usualy yeilds good top speed
 

JerboaJohn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Messages
1,130
ah ok,, TY,,
thought it might be something like that. then probly not oughtta take anything off but to balance it I guess.
I got the idea bcs I saw 2 stroke stuffing's vid on truing a crank, and he had one that was beveled edges. so I got thinking
 

dparenti13

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
119
Less rotational mass will spin up faster with no load but under load that inertia is needed to over come the compression and driven load,It will also turn less top rpm due to the loss of inertia/mass.I've balanced a crank that completly off set the reciprocating mass and it was a dog,at 50% there is some loss but very smooth 30-40% works best IMO and puts the sweet spot up high.Matching the sweet spot to the pipe staging allows safer high rpm use and usualy yeilds good top speed
That makes a lot more sense, thanks
 
Top