CVT Gas mileage question for people with Nuvinci hubs

Local time
2:14 AM
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
113
I was curious if anybody knows if there gas mileage improved when using a Nuvinci CVP? Seems like it would because the RPMs could be kept low. Anybody been paying attention to it?
 
I dont know but my 2-stroke with 44t and stock parts and cheap walmart bike scwhinn delmar with cheap roadmaster rear wheel i get 180mpg+ @ 30.6mph.
 
i guess it all depends on how you would ride it. I went from a friction kit to a chain drive on the nuvinci hub and i noticed a substantial decrase in mpg. I ride pretty aggressively keeping the rpms in the power band most all of the time and my fuel consumption has suffered for it.

I suppose if you like a lathargic boring ride (though your handle says other wise "breaksalltherules" =) than you could in fact get better mileage...
 
Well, logic always said a standard shift car always gets better mileage, that was mostly due to weight and using the clutch, but I have yet to try the auto hub, I am working on my first shiftkit bike with a 3-speed hub at the moment.

I don't know about mileage, but when you are talking 3 gears and no clutch needed it seems a no-brainer for most people, then again, one less control on the handle bars is a good thing at the mileage we get even without a shifter.

KC.gif
wee.gif
KC's Kruisers Glendale Arizona, USA
 
Hey, thanks for the replies guys! I figured the Nuvinci has the potential for great gas millage and longer engine life due to the ability to control the RPMs (that is the biggest determining factor for fuel efficiency as far as the engine goes, correct?) I guess it would be pretty tempting to throttle it up though.
 
i would imagine a decrease in millage especially vs a friction drive.

there is going to be some loss through the drive chain and fluid inside the hub.
 
The NuVinci is supposedly 90% efficient. You loose 10% due to internal slippage.
You gotta take that into account when pondering fuel economy.
Also, the NuVinci is not an automatic, just gearless. You still have to shift it with a handlebar controller.
http://www.fallbrooktech.com/08_bicycle_home.asp
I wonder if the newer version is better, IE less internal slippage.
I have heard that they are farming out the manufacturing now, and quality has suffered.
 
Hmmm good point. Do you think a belt drive Nuvinci, from the reduction box to the hub, would be more efficient? I remember reading about CVT belts causing a power loss... also Nuvinci has a smaller, tougher, lighter and wider gear range CVP out now. Called the Nuvinci 360. Just FYI
 
Gearnut, I was holding off on buying a Nuvinci untill the 360's came out so I'm very interested in any decreased manufacturing quality. Where did you read that? Thanks
 
Gearnut, I was holding off on buying a Nuvinci untill the 360's came out so I'm very interested in any decreased manufacturing quality. Where did you read that? Thanks

I read it in this forum or the other one which I dare not speak it's name.
It is hearsay, so take it with a grain of salt.
 
Back
Top