roughrider
Member
Hi All,
Definitely a new guy here. Got a question. I'be been trying to discern which four stroke engine/transmission combo is the narrowest, and the data is confusing. The widths I see on websites do not necessarily include the drive systems; more, the transmission/gearboxes etc. do not generally even state their width. This is an important issue for me as I come from a bicyclist's background, and I just hate the idea of a motored bike that I can't easily pedal, engine or not.
If I have have read my data correctly, it looks like it is possible to get a slightly narrower build with a Honda than an HS 142. Is that right? Any advice is welcomed.
Cheers,
Rick
Definitely a new guy here. Got a question. I'be been trying to discern which four stroke engine/transmission combo is the narrowest, and the data is confusing. The widths I see on websites do not necessarily include the drive systems; more, the transmission/gearboxes etc. do not generally even state their width. This is an important issue for me as I come from a bicyclist's background, and I just hate the idea of a motored bike that I can't easily pedal, engine or not.
If I have have read my data correctly, it looks like it is possible to get a slightly narrower build with a Honda than an HS 142. Is that right? Any advice is welcomed.
Cheers,
Rick