J
JemmaUK
Guest
Hi all,
One thing I havent noticed on here is any information about performance figures...
There are so many different engine/drive/frame configurations but I'm still curious as to why, when my little tiny two stroke can hit 30mph, people are shoving 80/160cc singles onto a push-bike... not to mention the vibration factor...
From what I can tell it would be like sitting on a field-marshall tractor made out of matchsticks...
does using the 49/80 type engines improve matters any perfomance wise, or is it just the american lazymotor idea of the more ccs or cui the better.. and I dont mean that nastily...
so can people post some perfomance figures - comparisons of different bikes and engines...
Mine is currently topping out at 46.6kph on grass, warm weather on an engine thats done less than 50 miles. And thats with more left
On tarmac I suspect it would make 35mph
Incidentally - anyone had any legality problems in the UK?
Jemma xx
One thing I havent noticed on here is any information about performance figures...
There are so many different engine/drive/frame configurations but I'm still curious as to why, when my little tiny two stroke can hit 30mph, people are shoving 80/160cc singles onto a push-bike... not to mention the vibration factor...
From what I can tell it would be like sitting on a field-marshall tractor made out of matchsticks...
does using the 49/80 type engines improve matters any perfomance wise, or is it just the american lazymotor idea of the more ccs or cui the better.. and I dont mean that nastily...
so can people post some perfomance figures - comparisons of different bikes and engines...
Mine is currently topping out at 46.6kph on grass, warm weather on an engine thats done less than 50 miles. And thats with more left
On tarmac I suspect it would make 35mph
Incidentally - anyone had any legality problems in the UK?
Jemma xx