Fabian
Well-Known Member
It can't "disappear". The oscillation gets transferred to the sprung chain tensioner wheel and it's pivot and spring, which oscillate 60,000 times every hour you ride your bike to compensate for the horribly eccentric engine output sprocket.
That is a true statement, but the left hand side chain tensioner does a surprising job; minimising vibration, as well as beefing up the shift kit with an extra bearing and side plate on the jackshaft.
I'm sure the LHS tensioner does a fantastic job as a band aid for the problem
It does, and until someone manufacturers a high quality 10T sprocket, the left hand side chain tensioner is the "only" option for removing excess vibration.
making the 10T engine output sprocket properly concentric and true will treat the root cause of the problem
I agree.
and is sure to extend the life of the LHS chain tensioner, allowing it to take up the slack caused by gradual chain stretch (wear) but not overstressing it.
My experience is that the left hand side chain tensioner can take a serious beating, and it hasn't proven to be over stressed in operation.
The forthcoming S.B.P. 10T engine output sprocket will also be extremely useful for single speed builds, so every HT builder will be a potential customer not just those who have the Shift Kit.
I agree.
(are you trying to convince SBP to change their mind about making this??)
Believe me, it is not easy trying to implore SickBikeParts to adopt an improved concept. I became mentally exhausted after spending 2 years trying to convince SickBikeParts that chain tensioners were not just necessary for the shift kit, but an absolute requirement for the Shift Kit, and that not everyone who builds a shift kit is a complete f*#kwit in setting up the kit and gaining the correct chain/sprocket alignment.
If i didn't have an "inbox" full of PM's with people asking me to manufacture my own versions of the left and right side chain tensioners, SickBikeParts may not have developed their own chain tensioner solutions, which were much more effective than my own solution to the problem.
Without those PM's i am sure i would have had a nervous breakdown trying to convince them to develop a properly engineered chain tensioner design for their shift kit.
As i have stated before: a single speed drive system is as useless as female mammary glands on a bull, and the shift kit is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but i have no idea why (in the design phase) you would stop at making the kit 98% effective, when the other 2% are just as important to usability and reliability.
Thankfully the problem has been addressed and the kit is now a "complete" and "reliable" solution for motorized bicycle transport.
It wouldn't be on my bike if it wasn't, and my bike wouldn't go to where it's been if it wasn't.
Last edited: