Sprung front engine mount - your thoughts?

Local time
2:15 PM
Joined
May 22, 2008
Messages
79
Location
Idaho
Hey,

Somewhat new to the forum, but after much research, one of the main repetitive problems I had read about was vibration.

So for my first build, I made a sprung front engine mount to try to aleviate the vibration problem.

Being I have never ridden an MBC yet, - hopefully tomorrow!! - I have no previous experience to base my design upon.

Do you think this design should work? - Or can you suggest any improvements?

The spacer I used in the center does not go all the way to the top. It has about a 3/8" gap to actuate the spring. So it should also act as a stop gap as well.

I also used rubber at all engine mount points between the clamps to reduce any vibration.

Take a look at the pic's, tell me what you think.

Thanks,

Troy Fitz.
 

Attachments

  • 100_2063.jpg
    100_2063.jpg
    62.1 KB · Views: 306
  • 100_2065.jpg
    100_2065.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 254
  • 100_2070.jpg
    100_2070.jpg
    143.9 KB · Views: 275
  • 100_2074.jpg
    100_2074.jpg
    59.1 KB · Views: 246
  • 100_2092.jpg
    100_2092.jpg
    110.3 KB · Views: 279
Well, I always appreciate new ideas and only trying it will tell if it works well. I sure does look good. My only concern is whether the extra movement allowed at the front mount will create stress points at the rear mount...but like I said, using it will tell the story.
 
To do it "right" you'd need another spring between the head of the bolt and the mount. As it stands now you're only getting half the vibration wave and it's going to slam the bolt head repeatedly... with more force than if you just had no spring to begin with.

Also in addition to a spring you need some sort of dampener... Think of a car suspension that has both springs and shocks... the shocks/dampeners keep vibrations from continuing forever.

I hate to be a wet blanket but this looks like a bad idea.

+1 to what's said above about being hard on the rear mount too.
 
To do it "right" you'd need another spring between the head of the bolt and the mount. As it stands now you're only getting half the vibration wave and it's going to slam the bolt head repeatedly... with more force than if you just had no spring to begin with.

Also in addition to a spring you need some sort of dampener... Think of a car suspension that has both springs and shocks... the shocks/dampeners keep vibrations from continuing forever.

+1 to what's said above about being hard on the rear mount too.

No worries: -
I asked the question to get feedback good or bad. I appreciate the good, but only the well reasoned critique can actually be useful for improvement.

I understand what you are saying. It makes sense, and it's a good suggestion.
The spring is pretty heavy duty and already has a load on it. Since I am automotive inclined, my thought was that it would be more akin to a valve spring. If it's strong enough it should be able to keep pace with the movement of the engine as it vibrates. A larger spring to eliminate valve float in higher RPM's. Or in this case increased vibration at higher speeds.

What do you think about this; since the spring already has a load on it, If I was to add a neoprene washer/grommet to the top stud, do you think that may be able to absorb some of the residual vibration? -(maybe two washers).

Appreciate your input,

Troy Fitz.
 
Neoprene would work well but fatigue fairly quickly. It will last long enough for "proof of concept". I used neoprene from an old mousepad as a sandwich between my motor mount brackets and the frame. It collapsed and I retightened the mount bolts so it probably may as well not even be in there.

I put some new shock absorbers on the rear of my cutlass ciera and they came with new "rubber" doodads the bolt went through. I reused my old doodads as I'm lazy. These doodads would be just about perfect for what you're doing.
 
I am very familiar with the "HELP" section in any automotive store. That is actually where my spring came from. I debated for awhile between rubber or a spring. Due to the strength of the one I chose, I figured it would have greater endurance than any type of poly-rubber material. The material I am referring to would be pretty much what your "doodads" were made from. Very strong. I'll take a trip back to the store tomorrow to see what I can find.

Thanks for the follow up,

Troy Fitz.
 
Quick update

At this time, I have 30 miles on the bike w/ no changes to the top bolt. I have gone up to 22mph at times w/ no vibration at all. The rear mount seems to be just fine.
So far, it's a great mod.
I will give further updates after the bike is officially broken in.

Thanks,

Troy Fitz.
 
The mount looks great, IMHO. I wish I saved my old bump stops (doodads) last shock change on the car. I will definitely be doing something like this when I get my mb.
 
All I've read in the last year here is that rubber fails. The shock absorber "doodads" are bushings. http://www.energysuspension.com/pages/shockbush.html .The spring looks like an awesome idea. Please keep us up to date on how it works. You could always go to the junk yard and pull some off a wrecked car.
From what I understand, the Happy Times are so unbalanced in the bottom end that there's not much we can do.
BTW I love the black engine, you did a great job on that build.
The spring is a brilliant idea.
 
how has this mount been working out for you? any plans to build a sprung rear mount as well?
 
Back
Top