safe
Active Member
- Local time
- 2:56 AM
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,319
More Simulation Fun...
No real hard info to add today because I'm still figuring out how to do things with the Simulation software. What I want to do is get as exact of a Simulation of the motor as possible and be able to at least visually look at what will happen. The tool has some more advanced stuff too that will give good feedback about things like torque produced... so by the time I actually have the thing built I'm hoping to have some predictions about performance in advance. By the end of my brushed motor rewinding experiences I had gotten all the formula's figured out and was recording results that were the same as predicted.
Today I finally got the electrical coils figured out and this is a first look at how the magnetic flux lines bend:
...just by looking at the colors the efficiency looks to be good with an air gap on each side of about 1/4". So in total the overall air gap separating the magnets would be 1/4" + 1/2" + 1/4" = 1" which is very relaxed as far as tolerances. (makes getting a grinder in there easier)
The fact that the CSIRO solar racer is reporting efficiencies as high as 97% gives me something to shoot for. My existing bike has a "best" efficiency of about 78%, but then the geardown takes away about 5%, then another 5% for the drive chain and more because of the averaging of the powerband so that in the end I'm probably getting about 65% efficiency at the rear wheel.
97% - 65% = 32% difference... which is a lot...
For a 1000 watt input that means 970 watts at the rear wheel verses 650 watts at the rear wheel or a difference of 320 watts.
For a 2000 watt input that means 1940 watts at the rear wheel verses 1300 watts at the rear wheel or a difference of 640 watts. (1 hp = 750 watts)
My old bike is wasting nearly a full horsepower because of efficiency losses...
No real hard info to add today because I'm still figuring out how to do things with the Simulation software. What I want to do is get as exact of a Simulation of the motor as possible and be able to at least visually look at what will happen. The tool has some more advanced stuff too that will give good feedback about things like torque produced... so by the time I actually have the thing built I'm hoping to have some predictions about performance in advance. By the end of my brushed motor rewinding experiences I had gotten all the formula's figured out and was recording results that were the same as predicted.
Today I finally got the electrical coils figured out and this is a first look at how the magnetic flux lines bend:
...just by looking at the colors the efficiency looks to be good with an air gap on each side of about 1/4". So in total the overall air gap separating the magnets would be 1/4" + 1/2" + 1/4" = 1" which is very relaxed as far as tolerances. (makes getting a grinder in there easier)
The fact that the CSIRO solar racer is reporting efficiencies as high as 97% gives me something to shoot for. My existing bike has a "best" efficiency of about 78%, but then the geardown takes away about 5%, then another 5% for the drive chain and more because of the averaging of the powerband so that in the end I'm probably getting about 65% efficiency at the rear wheel.
97% - 65% = 32% difference... which is a lot...
For a 1000 watt input that means 970 watts at the rear wheel verses 650 watts at the rear wheel or a difference of 320 watts.
For a 2000 watt input that means 1940 watts at the rear wheel verses 1300 watts at the rear wheel or a difference of 640 watts. (1 hp = 750 watts)
My old bike is wasting nearly a full horsepower because of efficiency losses...
Attachments
Last edited: