loquin
Well-Known Member
Cool.
I was looking at Lovejoy CV drives (industrial versions of that CVT) yesterday. One of their options is to have a fixed pulley size on the drive end, and the spring-loaded pulley sheave at the driven end. To adjust the ratio, you simply move the drive pulley closer of farther from the driven end... the spring takes up any slack, and the ratio changes (larger reduction when you move the drive pulley towards the driven sheave.) The ratio range isn't as great as when you have sheaves moving at both ends, but, it's in the 80 percent range.
I believe you could get the same effect (if/when the CVT drive sheave dies) by replacing the drive sheave with a fixed pulley (same size as the sheave is currently at greatest reduction ratio) and adding an idler pulley inside the CVT belt, and moving it out (or in,) to tighten/loosen the belt. When the belt tightens, it would cause the driven sheave to widen out, and the ratio to decrease. In effect, you would have a manual shifting CVT...
I was looking at Lovejoy CV drives (industrial versions of that CVT) yesterday. One of their options is to have a fixed pulley size on the drive end, and the spring-loaded pulley sheave at the driven end. To adjust the ratio, you simply move the drive pulley closer of farther from the driven end... the spring takes up any slack, and the ratio changes (larger reduction when you move the drive pulley towards the driven sheave.) The ratio range isn't as great as when you have sheaves moving at both ends, but, it's in the 80 percent range.
I believe you could get the same effect (if/when the CVT drive sheave dies) by replacing the drive sheave with a fixed pulley (same size as the sheave is currently at greatest reduction ratio) and adding an idler pulley inside the CVT belt, and moving it out (or in,) to tighten/loosen the belt. When the belt tightens, it would cause the driven sheave to widen out, and the ratio to decrease. In effect, you would have a manual shifting CVT...
Last edited: