Multi-Speed setups, lemme ax you something

Multi-Speed: for topend or efficiency

  • More Top Speed

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • More Efficiency

    Votes: 8 88.9%

  • Total voters
    9

augidog

New Member
Local time
4:41 PM
Joined
Apr 20, 2008
Messages
1,993
assuming we already understand both the mechanical and emotional reasoning.

i think i asked the question wrong...i have seen multi-speed shift-kits & hubs (successfully) used either for or more speed or more hauling.

i'm merely interested, no need for debates or criticism.

using 30mph as a benchmark, is your multi-speed MB designed for speed or hauling. only 2 choices no "mix"...just the main reason. i can't edit my poll, so "efficiency" means "hauling power"...thanks.
 
Last edited:
yes, it's cool to vote w/o a post, just click & scoot, and noone can see who or how.
 
Last edited:
Apparently I'm in a very small minority. With 33 miles to go at the end of a long day of work, speed trumps efficiency. Besides, it's way more efficient than a car anyhow.
 
I agree with all. Efficiency promotes a bit more speed, if wanted.

I have power in a narrow rpm range. On a steep hill, speed drops by 20mph or more with a single-gear engine drive. With the shift kit, speed might drop a few mph, but I'm in the engine's power range.
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
1
Views
2K
JemmaUK
J
Back
Top