Illegal practices?? The DMV does not consider it a moped. For a variety of reason none of which are illegal. And with that kind of thinking I am kinda happy you don't live in Florida either. Nobody is getting railroaded. Conspiracy theories abound.
State law
Number: AGO 77-84
Subject: Uniform Traffic Control Act, municipalities
J. T. Frankenberger
City Attorney
On consideration of the foregoing it is clear that the Legislature intended, by its comprehensive action in enacting Ch. 76-286, Laws of Florida, classifying motor-propelled bicycles or 'mopeds' as bicycles and determining how they were to be regulated on a uniform state-wide basis, to require that moped operators or riders be treated as bicycle operators or riders uniformly throughout the state and in all the municipalities therein. The Legislature by enactment of Ch. 316, as amended aforesaid, and by making it unlawful to enact, and prohibiting the enactment or enforcement of, any traffic ordinances in conflict therewith has effectively preempted the regulation of bicycle/mopeds to the state. Furthermore, because moped operators had, prior to such action, been required to wear the same protective devices as other motorcycle riders according to the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the reclassifying of mopeds as bicycles clearly demonstrates that the Legislature intended that moped riders be relieved of the requirements of wearing such protective devices throughout the state.
The Legislature defines a moped as a bicycle in s. 316.003, F. S., and changed the definition of 'bicycle,' 'motorcycle,' and 'motor-driven cycles' and excludes motor-propelled bicycles or 'mopeds' from the definition of 'motor vehicle,' 'motor-driver cycles,' and 'vehicle' by Ch. 76-286, Laws of Florida, as reference to the title thereof clearly discloses, and provides regulations for such motor-propelled bicycles or 'mopeds' in s. 316.111, F. S. In the latter section the Legislature provided special regulations in subsections (14) and (15) applicable only to the operation of
bicycle/mopeds. More
On consideration of the foregoing it is clear that the Legislature intended, by its comprehensive action in enacting Ch. 76-286, Laws of Florida, classifying motor-propelled bicycles or 'mopeds' as bicycles and determining how they were to be regulated on a uniform state-wide basis, to require that moped operators or riders be treated as bicycle operators or riders uniformly throughout the state and in all the
municipalities therein.
Debra
Floyd
Daytona Beach Police
why have some gotten tags?
Understand once and for all G,the DMV is a LICENSING agency,it has nothing to do per se with TRAFFIC LAW which is governed by the Florida UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL STATUTES, codified under Section 316 FS (Florida Statues). Section 316.003 encompasses definitions,which inform you what certain terms mean,as far as the traffic statutes are concerned.Did that finally sink in ?
Now under 316.003 sub section 77 , ANY 2 wheeled vehicle,with pedals for propulsion without a gearshift&manually operated clutch,with an engine not exceeding 50cc displacement and less than 2 HP and not capable of not faster than 30mph is considered a MOPED as far as traffic statutes are concerned.Most MB's fall under that definition.
Mopeds need to be licensed, that is what both the DMV and the Traffic Code happen to agree on,however the DMV has no definition as to what an MB is except that it is NOT a moped and in refusing to license them it chooses to ignore the definition under the TRAFFIC Code.Since the police are authorized to issue at traffic ticket to persons operating a legally unlicensed vehicle,and the DMV refuses to license it,this Agency in effect sees fit to keep MB's,except electrically powered ones off the road,which may well be their intention.They regard them as a nuisance they don't want to mess with,I'm sure.
We shall see how BGW fares in Court.