D
Deleted member 12676
Guest
>There would be far more benefit from one of those heads than from using one of your ignition retard units.
Hmm, let me see... 5% gain by compression increase, or 10% gain by spark strength increase and correct timing. gosh, it is so hard to decide which is better. same price range. hmm, maybe most smart people will just shave down their stock head and buy the Jaguar CDI to get both advantages.
>Well, if Jennings really said that, that is too bad. He is very mistaken then.
oh yeah, like a simple machinist that doesn't even know two strokes need ignition delay at high rpm knows better than the world famous Gordon Jennings. yeah right
I'm not credible? That's like saying a scientist who discovered the purpose of a particular gene is just making **** up and trying to fool people. I am the one who has provided scientific backup for what I am saying, and the endorsement of someone known world-wide for his motorcycle tuning info. What has Fred provided? nothing other than the "word" of someone trying to sell you a cylinder head. This thread was not about my CDI. I just had to defend its purpose after Fred maliciously attacked it in a desperate attempt to draw attention away from the research I've presented showing a squish band is not needed and may even be detrimental to an engine not highly modified. I fight for the members of this forum right to an informed choice as to what they want to spend their hard-earned dollars on. I have presented the scientific information which the sellers of heads do not want them to see. And for that Fred slanders me. Any fool can see what the score is here. Like I said, I rest my case.
Hmm, let me see... 5% gain by compression increase, or 10% gain by spark strength increase and correct timing. gosh, it is so hard to decide which is better. same price range. hmm, maybe most smart people will just shave down their stock head and buy the Jaguar CDI to get both advantages.
>Well, if Jennings really said that, that is too bad. He is very mistaken then.
oh yeah, like a simple machinist that doesn't even know two strokes need ignition delay at high rpm knows better than the world famous Gordon Jennings. yeah right
I'm not credible? That's like saying a scientist who discovered the purpose of a particular gene is just making **** up and trying to fool people. I am the one who has provided scientific backup for what I am saying, and the endorsement of someone known world-wide for his motorcycle tuning info. What has Fred provided? nothing other than the "word" of someone trying to sell you a cylinder head. This thread was not about my CDI. I just had to defend its purpose after Fred maliciously attacked it in a desperate attempt to draw attention away from the research I've presented showing a squish band is not needed and may even be detrimental to an engine not highly modified. I fight for the members of this forum right to an informed choice as to what they want to spend their hard-earned dollars on. I have presented the scientific information which the sellers of heads do not want them to see. And for that Fred slanders me. Any fool can see what the score is here. Like I said, I rest my case.