It is going to be next to impossible to arrive at the needed ratios without a pulley reduction somewhere in the system.
If you run a 2.5" pulley on the motor and a rear sheave [Whizzer type], the ratio will be 6.3 X 1 and the low HP motor won't pull the bike. If you try to use a smaller pulley on the motor, chances are the belt will slip too much. The Whizzer system is approx 9 X 1 and has twice as much power as the Clinton motor. I would guess the ratio with the small motor would need to be at least 12 X 1 or higher. Another reason to use a pulley reduction system is to move the rear belt drive inward to align with the rear wheel [like Whizzer does].
As far as going 40 to 45, I would say it is almost impossible with less than 2 HP. I would think getting to 35 MPH might even be hard to achieve.
I am not trying to discourage you, but you might want to have a "back-up" plan with higher ratios for the small HP motor.
Hope this information is helpful.
Have fun,
If you run a 2.5" pulley on the motor and a rear sheave [Whizzer type], the ratio will be 6.3 X 1 and the low HP motor won't pull the bike. If you try to use a smaller pulley on the motor, chances are the belt will slip too much. The Whizzer system is approx 9 X 1 and has twice as much power as the Clinton motor. I would guess the ratio with the small motor would need to be at least 12 X 1 or higher. Another reason to use a pulley reduction system is to move the rear belt drive inward to align with the rear wheel [like Whizzer does].
As far as going 40 to 45, I would say it is almost impossible with less than 2 HP. I would think getting to 35 MPH might even be hard to achieve.
I am not trying to discourage you, but you might want to have a "back-up" plan with higher ratios for the small HP motor.
Hope this information is helpful.
Have fun,