BoltsMissing
Active Member
I'm not good on finalizing numbers, but ok with principles.
It goes like this,
The current price hikes of fuel for motor cars, might reach a sort critical mass type of thing, which means it will not be so cost effective for Mr and Ms Average with a home loan and a couple of kids to get to work.
If the cost of traveling to work exceeds the benefit of working, then the law will have no use what so ever because if no one is able to get to work, then the govs. lose on income tax revenue.
So let them play with fuel prices all they like till the cows come home, it will eventually cause a type of seizure and society won't be able to budge and dare I say, and maybe not in my life time yet, Anarchy.
What are the govs. going to do then, provide free public transport to get the workers to work and drop them back off home at the door step of their own home, so to continue collecting income tax,to pay for the same public transport that took them to work in the first place ?
Sumwun said, the biggest cost factor in production is transport.
How much does it cost to get a kilo of grapes from the vineyard to the retail grocery, for example ?
This may sound Owellianish, ( I don't read books unless it has something to do with winning lotto btw, but lately lots of reading here !) but I am no doomsayer, I just will not own a car so I don't have to "entertain" the price of fuel. I ride a bike and now it's a HT bike till the law say's I can't, then I still will cos my legs hurt. Jaol me, THANKYOU I'll get fed.
Fine me ? I can't pay, first I eat then maybe I pay my fines if any crumbs are left, if the ants don't get the crumbs first.
Stuff em, it has come to a showdown as far as I an concerned, I have to get my groceries 2 miles down the road one way or another and back again.
All this **** about a good idea being outlawed is from the same line of mongrels who banned motoredcycles at bike shows, now it's back to haunt you !
Man is nomadic by nature.
It goes like this,
The current price hikes of fuel for motor cars, might reach a sort critical mass type of thing, which means it will not be so cost effective for Mr and Ms Average with a home loan and a couple of kids to get to work.
If the cost of traveling to work exceeds the benefit of working, then the law will have no use what so ever because if no one is able to get to work, then the govs. lose on income tax revenue.
So let them play with fuel prices all they like till the cows come home, it will eventually cause a type of seizure and society won't be able to budge and dare I say, and maybe not in my life time yet, Anarchy.
What are the govs. going to do then, provide free public transport to get the workers to work and drop them back off home at the door step of their own home, so to continue collecting income tax,to pay for the same public transport that took them to work in the first place ?
Sumwun said, the biggest cost factor in production is transport.
How much does it cost to get a kilo of grapes from the vineyard to the retail grocery, for example ?
This may sound Owellianish, ( I don't read books unless it has something to do with winning lotto btw, but lately lots of reading here !) but I am no doomsayer, I just will not own a car so I don't have to "entertain" the price of fuel. I ride a bike and now it's a HT bike till the law say's I can't, then I still will cos my legs hurt. Jaol me, THANKYOU I'll get fed.
Fine me ? I can't pay, first I eat then maybe I pay my fines if any crumbs are left, if the ants don't get the crumbs first.
Stuff em, it has come to a showdown as far as I an concerned, I have to get my groceries 2 miles down the road one way or another and back again.
All this **** about a good idea being outlawed is from the same line of mongrels who banned motoredcycles at bike shows, now it's back to haunt you !
Man is nomadic by nature.