Try this: Exclude anything with wheels.
Now consider just one thing; Vehicle, any and all vehicles.
We will add any item to the list of "vehicles" if it follows the law and it is used for transportation.
A bicycle powered by a human that is used to carry messages for payment, should be considered a vehicle, however since it was specifically excluded, we cannot.
Now a 100 hp motorcycle. Is it used for profit? If so, it is a vehicle. If not, ACCORDING TO THE LAW, it is not a vehicle and no registration or Drivers license is required
Listen to the lawyer B.S. at the end of the video.
No evidence? No license, no license plate, no insurance. You believe that there was no evidence?
Start this video at 0:50
.
ROTFLMAO....
NOW you are completely switching gears....
First you were describing statutes pertaining to licensing and now you're bringing up the "right to travel"
You must know that, that is a foolhearty attempt.
You can look at it this way...
You may have the right to travel unimpeded by the government but, the government does have the right to regulate such things.
In the case of driving without insurance, sure you can do that but if you get stopped and they give you a ticket you have to pay it (eventually) and in that way they regulate it. If at that point you don't pay it, they have a right to hold you in contempt of a court order and lock you up or whatever the agreed upon reparation is.
You might as well just go the route that there really is no such thing as government or states OR fictitious/strawman names OR the idea that just because you're physically located in a "state" there's no legal ground for them to have jurisdiction over you, because they can't give "facts" that the laws do apply OR the other myriad/hundreds of attempts that people use to try to skirt around the law because THEY don't agree with it, although the other 95% of the population does.
The right to travel argument has been beaten to death, time and time again... And in 99.9999999% of those cases, that "argument" has failed to hold up in every court in the land.
Just because some backwards town has let someone get away with the right to travel argument (which we don't REALLY know, IF that was the deciding factor), that doesn't make it true or correct for everywhere else.
(I have a strange feeling that the "real" reason for his win had nothing to do with the "right to travel" argument.
Just my .02 / opinion.
P.S. At least NOW in Florida there is a procedure setup to allow those who want to register their (gas) bikes as mopeds and not have to worry about the ramifications of not doing that. And yes, I know that doesn't help the people that don't have licenses, but at least they still have the option of an electric bicycle... Not anyone's fault, but those who did whatever it was that allowed their driving privileges to be rescinded...
I'm happy I'm in a state that allows electric bicycle usage without the need of a license. There are states that don't allow that. And even other states that don't allow their usage at all, even if you have a drivers license.