KilroyCD
Active Member
Gentlemen (and ladies), I for one would not like to see this discussion lead to an EPA-fired argument as happened last year. I believe the main purpose of this thread was to have been informative, showing us what a real EPA certification label looks like and how it should read. Instead, I've seen the thread become almost malicious at times, with vendors bashing other vendors and members getting a bit overheated.
We don't need another rift between members again. It was ugly, and we're still feeling the effects from the last one.
Let's take the factual information presented here and discard the heresay. We can make our decisions based on that information. We don't need one vendor bashing another vendor's products. That is self defeating. In the retail establishment where I work, any company's sales reps that bash another company's products are shown the door. We certainly don't want to institute such a policy here. Let's keep things civil, please.
We don't need another rift between members again. It was ugly, and we're still feeling the effects from the last one.
Let's take the factual information presented here and discard the heresay. We can make our decisions based on that information. We don't need one vendor bashing another vendor's products. That is self defeating. In the retail establishment where I work, any company's sales reps that bash another company's products are shown the door. We certainly don't want to institute such a policy here. Let's keep things civil, please.
Last edited:
