agreed
but it does
avoid rigidity...another valid (bicycle) wheel-danger. i'm merely suggesting a happy-medium for the common MB-rider using common bicycle wheels.
if you want to start counting on the (bicycle) wheel assembly itself to take torque it wasn't designed for, then we're talking about building a proper wheel that won't need reinforcing. i believe my (racing) GEBE/Velocity wheelset to be one such example, i hope to prove that in september.
back on point: despite my new twist, the original discussion of light ring-"locks" is a very intriguing (and seemingly effective) fix for the folks who have a "slippery" ring. imo, said "slip" can be minimized by tieing the other side and reducing uneven flexing...and adding our ring-locks would result in about as strong a DIY-wheel as the home builder could hope for.
like all of us, i'm waiting to see some data on the minimum number of ring-locks we need to get the result we want.