well i for one think moondog is the only one making any sense.
i'm tough enough, and cool enough to ride a moped. its what i usually call my creation. its much easier to say/type motorized bicycle.
i think here in north america when we hear the word moped, ugly looking scooter things pop into your brain, when in actual fact most of the early euro mopeds where nothing more than bicycles with engines mounted to them.
only difference was they where done in a factory and not as a d.i.y. project.
if doing it yourself makes it a motorized bicycle, then maybe i don't ride a moped.
mounting engines to bicycles is not a new thing, peeps been doing it for over 80 years.
only differance is, up until recently, they've always been referred to as mopeds.
now if ya really wanted to get into literal defintions, a motor is electric, an engine refers to compustion.
so unless ya ride an electric bicycle, motorized is completely off the mark.
either name, we all think there fun! cant we all just agree there great?
i'm tough enough, and cool enough to ride a moped. its what i usually call my creation. its much easier to say/type motorized bicycle.
i think here in north america when we hear the word moped, ugly looking scooter things pop into your brain, when in actual fact most of the early euro mopeds where nothing more than bicycles with engines mounted to them.
only difference was they where done in a factory and not as a d.i.y. project.
if doing it yourself makes it a motorized bicycle, then maybe i don't ride a moped.
mounting engines to bicycles is not a new thing, peeps been doing it for over 80 years.
only differance is, up until recently, they've always been referred to as mopeds.
now if ya really wanted to get into literal defintions, a motor is electric, an engine refers to compustion.
so unless ya ride an electric bicycle, motorized is completely off the mark.
either name, we all think there fun! cant we all just agree there great?