well!
i'm responding to the same issues i always respond to...ethics, honesty, loyalty...hunh, some surprising replies from
surprising sources.
so...one guy says that another guy can't start a topic without everyone jumping on him...hmmm, ya'mean, like, when an experienced leader wants to talk about something and the HT guys jump all over him?
what the **** am i, chopped liver? i know what the heck i'm talking about...peeps screw each other by choice, hardly ever by accident...some people here have made choices, i want to talk about it...but god forbid i try to open a freakin' EPA-topic!
so...i'm running the same 33cc 2-stroke (and every other part of the kit) after 3500 miles, it comes "production" with a catalytic convertor and epa/carb label, it keeps up with or outruns any HT i encounter, it does it at 50:1...why the heck am i supposed to tread on egghells with a performance record like that?
to lay a question to rest: yes! documention
can be equated with quality!! and...VALUE!!!
yup. i'm the "someone" who named the HT, i'm one of the original HT-rebels...and all i had to do to keep the peace was continue to accept my "free" samples and pimp 'em...sorry, i'm a us military veteran and it didn't take long for me to see the american consumer is a horrible soldier when it comes to economic warfare.
"SOMEONE" used to tell me that they admired my forthrightness, now that same someone has no problem dumping on me without naming me...scottm (among others)...take a closer look...even while you've fought "us" we've managed to force importers to be honest about the "80cc" scam (see the grube inc site), to attempt more quality control, and most recently, to pursue true EPA compliance...is there anything
else you'd like to tell us we were wrong about?
please, quit acting as if i quit caring. as soon as a 48cc HT has a legitimate EPA/C.A.R.B label on it, i'm trying one