Frankenstein
Deceased - Frankenstein 1991 - 2018
- Local time
- 4:44 PM
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2016
- Messages
- 5,035
Yes, power will increase as more rpm is thrown in, but at what cost? More fuel, hotter engine, less life. If you are using more fuel than optimal torque are you really cruising? No probably not. If I were to build a transmission for that vehicle then I'd probably keep my cruising engine speed right where torque falls and hp climbs past. This would be a good spot to make my normal cruise rpm for my environment. On that graph its about 5500 rpm.this is what a typical dyno sheet looks like, in this case for a corvette Z06
notice how torque tops out around 4700 RPM while power keeps climbing all the way to around 6300
I would also like to point out the transition zone from max torque drop to the point where hp starts to max is where the fuel and air are least needed to generate that power. So a cooler burning engine will last longer, so I figure my powerband is in that 5 to 6k range since it starts to look shaky after that and so my transmission would cover most low and high speeds within that 1-1.5k range. Obviously more fuel and air at the same time give more power through the entire rpm range, but that changes the optimal rpm range, it also puts more stress on the motor and drivetrain.
Most people will not have a dyno to hook the bike up to, and will need to feel it out, we also already have an idea of what to expect from these motors what to use carb size-wise and what rpm to use it in. If I can get away with tuning low end rpm to be as good as it will be and base my drivetrain on that so I can get a lot of reliable power for a long time.
Last edited: