Define 'Best' ...
- price
- performance
- quality/reliability
- ease of installation
- appearance
- maintainability(how easy is it to work on?)
- spares availability
- rider weight
- terrain
- climate
- ...
and, there are probably more things to consider. They ALL enter in to the mix, and every person's definition of which of these factors are important, and which are less so, is different.
For the first seven factors, think about them, and give them an importance weighting, of 1 to 10, say. Then, when comparing the various kits, you could assign them each a estimate of how well they meet the factor you're considering - also, from 1 to 10. When you've done that, multiply the two numbers together for each factor, add the results all up, and compare the numbers... the bigger the final number, the 'Better' that kit is ... for
YOU.
In my case, (I want a system that is well made, very reliable 'out of the box', that I can spend my time riding, and not adjusting/fiddling with/repairing,) my personal importance weightings would be
- price: 5
- performance: 6
- quality/reliability: 10
- ease of installation: 5
- appearance: 1
- maintainability: 8
- spares availability: 9
I've attached a spreadsheet with my evaluation of some of the kits. Adjust it with your importance ratings, and your 'intangibles' (weight/terrain/climate, etc.) In my case, climate is hot and dry, so friction drive gets good performance marks. In a wet climate, not so much...