Censorship of free speech lives on, even on this site of which I have been a member since 2008.
The rules apply to everyone regardless of how long one has been here or how much they have contributed...
It's this same type of "entitled" thinking that we also have in Washington D.C. that keeps perpetuating the problems we have now in this country that just keep getting worse, never better...
Rules apply to everyone, not just the entitled, elitist few who think it is their due because of length of time or contributions made in the past.
I'll report the answer from Red LIne
anyway and hope it is not deleted.
I have repeatedly asked you for an independent, unbiased lab report that is
NOT from Redlines sales propaganda machine and you continually ignore that this is what is needed for proof of what amounts to nothing more than your opinionated claims...There is no such a thing as the "best" oil as you continually claim there is, they ALL know how to make oil, It is just that they ALL have different characteristics blended with different additives for different purposes is all.
Also since you seem to be crying "Censorship", read what is stated on this subject found also at the end of the Forum Rules.
The First Amendment only applies to actions undertaken by the government, so-called “state action.”
As private entities, social media platforms are therefore free to make their own editorial decisions and develop their own community standards. Users of these platforms still have broader free expression rights that are important to recognize, but they go beyond the narrow First Amendment rights discussed here.
Further, some content moderation practices can amount to censorship, just not the kind scrutinized by the First Amendment. Whether or not this type of censorship is beneficial is an entirely different issue. For example, we believe it is acceptable for a privately-owned social media platform to establish community standards that allow for the removal of pornography.
The First Amendment gives individuals the right to free speech and is intended to protect the American people from government censorship. It is not intended to empower the government to dictate what platforms can and cannot remove from their websites. There is a balance, and calling all content moderation “censorship” as a means to political ends throws this balance completely out the window.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee to discuss censorship
www.publicknowledge.org
And just to add to all of that, this forum is not even a U.S. based forum, it is owned and operated out of Australia...lol.
With that thought in mind......
It is now time to put this to bed permamently by locking this thread and possibly even deleting this thread in future if deemed necessary to do so.
JKN
