6blueoval9
Well-Known Member
Really did you happen to notice date on post?
Sure did but it's discussing more than just his 48cc motor.
Really did you happen to notice date on post?
I have one that still works but admitedly I havn't used it much,The port timmings on that post mentioned above are kinda useless with out knowing the jug height and weather it was a high pinned or low pistoned jug,And Idont know about you guy's but I havn't seen an exhaust port height of 29mm on etheir type ever.28 on some of the older ones still kicking around but 27 and higher is more norm now.I stuffed the original box to stop vibrations
I had a failure early also, after resoldering the joints it was all good again
Yes it does I forgot about that I was reffering to his page though,I not trying to bash him just pointing out that alot of his stuff is out dated as to what we are seeing now.I have said many times his work is much apperciated by myself and many others I'm sure.Sure did but it's discussing more than just his 48cc motor.
Exactly we all know Their are two main varients,Then the sub varients so like I said unless we know the whole deal it's really just a refference not a given.He did put that the 69 was a 40mm stroke and long rod so I geuss a high pinned piston but witch one your guess is as good as mine lol.I'm just wondering what 66 and 69cc motor he got his info from.
There were plenty of 40mm stroke engines around in 15 by numerous suppliers.Who was offering a 69cc in 2015?
Grubee had one as did many others, but I'm telling you he posted that in 2012 on here and probably added the counter at a later date.All the messurements for the 69 TBH makes me think they were just guesitmated as to what would work to fit his recomendations,Just saying because I've not seen those depths to transfer or exhaust ever the intake is close.Who was offering a 69cc in 2015?
You beat me to it LOLThere were plenty of 40mm stroke engines around in 15 by numerous suppliers.