Are you done having your little temper tantrum yet?
You spat your dummy out over a circuit that you said wouldn't work with a dynamo if it had a built in rectifier. I pointed out that you were wrong and demonstrated why. Then you made another post, much longer this time, where you made several more angry, demonstrably wrong claims.
Some of them were you trying to talk authoritatively about electrical principles that you misunderstood. Others were just you not understanding prior posts because you didn't read them all the way through.
At any rate you're in no position to accuse others of having a tantrum. You got angry that you were wrong, and responded to it by getting angrier and being more wrong.
CroMagnum said:
Your little TVS diodes are not regulators - they're just transient protection. Like a MOV. They'll soon blow out if you rely on them to clamp the output every single cycle.
The voltage of alternating current electricity is a
sine wave. Transient protection for a transient rise above acceptable voltage is the job it was invented for.
If you buy an off the shelf bike dynamo regulator, what you get is a TVS diode in a little package with two ring terminals. I know because I bought one when I needed one, then unwrapped it to see what's in there:
https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/dynamos/reflectalite-regulator-xgen2-for-sturmey-archer-dynohub/
If you need Dynamo power regulated into a smooth, stable DC supply, there's other solutions. But that's beyond what we need for our purposes. The modern LED lamps handle that themselves, and nicad batteries don't care.
CroMagnum said:
Of course, once you clamp the alternator's output then you lose more voltage through the rectifier and you're low.
You lose voltage though the rectifier no matter what you do. That's inherent to rectification, diodes have an immutable voltage drop.
Our little TVS Diode isn't going to effect this because they have very little leakage below the voltage that they turn on.
CroMagnum said:
Much better and more efficient to rectify and filter it first and then regulate it down to what you need. Especially when purpose-built rectifier/regulators are already available for $4 retail. Why build some Mickey Mouse piece of junk instead?
No this isn't true either, you keep saying things that aren't true. If you want to regulate your voltage down after it's rectified, then you need your rectifying diodes to be capable of withstanding the current unregulated - the regulator will not protect them because it's not in place to do so. This means you need bigger diodes with a higher blocking voltage, which means you're also having to put up with a higher voltage drop.
Compare the following:
1N5817 - blocking voltage 20V - drop 0.45V
1N5818 - blocking voltage 30V - drop 0.55V
1N5818 - blocking voltage 40V - drop 0.60V
In a bridge rectifier there are two diodes active at any one time. So if we built it with 1N5818, the most efficient diode that can still survive being the wrong side of the TVS with the 12V dynamo if it overvolts, we're losing an extra 0.2V, compared to 1N5817 placed after the TVS.
That's about 3% power loss to do it your way, which isn't a disaster, but it's still both more slightly more expensive and slightly less efficient.
As for your $4 off the shelf regulator/rectifier unit, do you know what the voltage drop is going to be on that? I bet it's more.
CroMagnum said:
And you and I will have to agree to disagree on electrical tape under the fork clamp. If that's your idea of good building practice then I have no respect for the stuff you build.
You've repeatedly shot your mouth about basic electronics and repeatedly been proven wrong, so I'm glad I don't have your respect. You don't have the reasoning skills to know how to assign respect correctly.
These lack of reasoning skills were demonstrated when you suggested cracking open and manually rewinding a dynamo, which can take hours, when the same result can be achieved with ten centimetres of black PVC electrical tape, which takes ten seconds.