Motorized Bike laws in CA

Local time
7:17 PM
Joined
Jul 21, 2018
Messages
31
Motorized Bicycles of Type CVC §406(b)
Fortunately, a motorized bicycle or moped classified as type CVC §406(b) does not require a license plate, registration fee or insurance. However, it’s important to note that you still must be 16 years old and wear a properly fitted bicycle helmet whenever you are riding.
For a motorized bicycle or moped to be classified as type CVC §406(b), it must:
  • Have pedals and an electric motor that produces no more than 1,000 watts.
  • Be unable to propel itself more than 20 mph on level ground, including with assisted pedaling.
If your bike meets the above criteria, then you can enjoy riding without a license!
 
Motorized Bicycles of Type CVC §406(a)
Being a little higher powered, in order for a motorized bicycle or moped to be classified as type CVC §406(a), it must:
  • Have pedals for manual propulsion by the rider (unless it is powered by an electric motor.)
  • Have an automatic transmission.
  • Have a motor that produces less than 2 brake horsepower.
  • Be unable to propel itself more than 30 MPH on level ground, including with assisted pedaling.
Motorized bicycles of type CVC §406(a) also require special license plates and identification cards, which carry a one time fee of $18. The fee must be paid via check or money order.
You will need to fill out a Motorized Bicycle Application form and mail it, along with the fee, to the following address:
 
So Where do we fall into?

406(A)
  • Have pedals and an electric motor that produces no more than 1,000 watts.
406(B)
  • Have pedals for manual propulsion by the rider (unless it is powered by an electric motor.)
  • Have an automatic transmission.
 
We are 406 A
You are only quoting part of 406 A and your 406 B definition is part of 406 A too.

Section 406(a) CVC refers to a moped or motorized bicycle as any two or three wheeled device having fully operative pedals for propulsion by human power, or having no pedals if powered solely by electrical energy, has an automatic transmission, and a motor which produces less than 4 gross brake horsepower and is capable of propelling the device at a maximum speed of not more than 30 miles per hour on level ground.
A driver license with an M-1 or M-2 endorsement is required.


406 B was only for ebikes but 406 B has been recently replaced by 3 classes of electric bicycles on the link below.
406 B does not apply now
and never included an auto trans in its definition.
The DMV does not update its website and does not remove outdated laws like 406 B
and you are posting info from dmv.org which is a private for profit website.

Read this for an overview of up to date laws on all motorized vehicles in CA:
https://www.chp.ca.gov/programs-ser...clist-safety/motorcycles-and-similar-vehicles
 
Last edited:
I have no cent. clutch, so no auto trans - nothing on that page applies directly to my 2-stroke.
 
The automatic verbiage is mostly poor wording. In FL, the description they use is something like "no clutch use or manually shifted gears after the engine is engaged" instead of saying it has to be "Automatic". The clutch the little 2strokes have do not exempt the bikes from being considered automatics since you do not shift gears. The clutch is strictly for starting the bike, and disengaging the drive for coming to a complete stop without it stalling.

The MB laws are a bunch of political BS that changes often, which sucks for us since it is hard to keep up with the laws if you care about em. I would imagine CA smog nazis would care more about it being a 2stroke oil eater than they do about the engine size or transmission.

Down here, updated laws now state that any gas MB regardless of size must be registered as a moped and rider must have a valid drivers license. No more seperate class of vehicle for them, and they specifically state that only electric motors are considered "Motorized bicycles". Still don't need insurance or a motorcycle license, but they are supposed to be registered and have headlights and brakelights to be considered legal here. Stinks for all the guys that have them while they wait out their license revocations!
 
I have no cent. clutch, so no auto trans - nothing on that page applies directly to my 2-stroke.
If that is your position then that just makes you illegal to ride on the streets like the
Pocket bikes, Mini motorcycles, minibikes, etc.

If you are not in one of these catergories then you aren't allowed to ride on CA streets.
https://www.chp.ca.gov/programs-ser...clist-safety/motorcycles-and-similar-vehicles

You are in an area in San Diego that does not bother to enforce CA motorized bicyle laws.
A lot of CA is like that. Lucky you.

Chinese bicycle engines have a manual clutch but also have no gears so it is a gray area.
After 10 years I have never heard of anyone getting a ticket for not having an auto trans
but many tickets for no dl, no license plate and no helmet.
 
they have a list there of things that one can't use - should they at some time add "anything with a motor, but not on this list is illegal" then they'd have it

as long as they do not mention manual trans, it is not on either list
if they do not say it is illegal, it is just unmentioned
 
OK the problems are that the dmv is citing code no longer in existence, and the information regarding an electric bike is part of a new definition that removed electric bikes from the definition of a moped. There is new information relating to what a motorized bike is considered, as seen in the proposed (and passed) bill: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1096

The bill begins with this digest summarizing what the bill is to do. "Existing law defines a “motorized bicycle” or a “moped” as a 2-wheeled or 3-wheeled device having fully operative pedals for propulsion by human power, or having no pedals if powered solely by electrical energy, and an automatic transmission and motor, as specified.
Existing law also defines a “motorized bicycle” as a device that has fully operative pedals for propulsion by human power and has an electric motor that meets specified requirements. Existing law requires a motorized bicycle, as described by this definition, to comply with specified equipment and manufacturing requirements. Existing law also imposes specified requirements relating to the operation of bicycles. A violation of the Vehicle Code is a crime.
This bill would delete the latter definition of a “motorized bicycle.” The bill would define an “electric bicycle” as a bicycle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts, and would create 3 classes of electric bicycles, as specified. The bill would require manufacturers or distributors of electric bicycles to affix a label to each electric bicycle that describes its classification number, top assisted speed, and motor wattage. The bill would require every electric bicycle manufacturer to certify that it complies with specified equipment and manufacturing requirements. The bill would also require an electric bicycle to operate in a manner so that the electric motor disengages or stops functioning when brakes are applied, or in a manner so that the release or activation of a switch or other mechanism disengages or stops the electric motor from functioning."


OK so the dmv is using old legislation as now the electric bicycle is not part of the definition of a moped and has nothing to do with motorized bikes, electric bicycles are defined as the below, and are subdivided to 3 classes based off the power of the motor.
312.5.
(a) An “electric bicycle” is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts.

Skipping the classes chit chat the definition of a moped has been changed to:
406.
(a) A “motorized bicycle” or “moped” is a two-wheeled or three-wheeled device having fully operative pedals for propulsion by human power, or having no pedals if powered solely by electrical energy, and an automatic transmission and a motor that produces less than 4 gross brake horsepower and is capable of propelling the device at a maximum speed of not more than 30 miles per hour on level ground.

Then to top it off the requirements to issue a license of any class have been changed, indicating that the following classes of vehicles require a driver's license in class a, b, or c before you can receive the m2 endorsement:

(5) (A) Class M2 includes the following:
(i) A motorized bicycle or moped, or a bicycle with an attached motor, except an electric bicycle as described in subdivision (a) of Section 312.5.
(ii) A motorized scooter.
(B) Authority to operate vehicles included in class M2 may be granted by endorsement on a class A, B, or C license upon completion of an appropriate examination, except that no endorsement is required for a motorized scooter. Persons holding a class M1 license or endorsement may operate vehicles included in class M2 without further examination.

The only possible loophole is in the piece of definition that accidentally states that:
(b) Every manufacturer of a motorized bicycle or moped, as defined in this section, shall provide a disclosure to buyers that advises buyers that their existing insurance policies may not provide coverage for these bicycles and that they should contact their insurance company or insurance agent to determine if coverage is provided. The disclosure shall meet both of the following requirements:

Which technically could mean he has already defined a motorized bicycle as "just a bicycle" funny enough he did it exactly 406(b) which happened to be the star of the tutorial.

Hopefully that sums it up enough, basically anything that does not meet the strict requirements for an electric bicycle will be considered a moped/motorized bicycle/bicycle with an attached motor (gotta love the airtight seal on that last one.)

You will need a license of some sort to get your m2 endorsement, and in http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...vision=3.&title=&part=&chapter=1.&article=8.1.
5030: A motorized bicycle, as defined in Section 406, is required to display a special license plate issued by the department.

So you'll need to plate it too.
 
Last edited:
they have a list there of things that one can't use - should they at some time add "anything with a motor, but not on this list is illegal" then they'd have it

as long as they do not mention manual trans, it is not on either list
if they do not say it is illegal, it is just unmentioned
Unfortunately they do specify an automatic transmission in the definition, so a manual would be in violation. I must say however every vehicle with a centrifugal clutch or other type of automatic engagement really must have a neutral gear for all safety purposes, engines are capable of 'running away' and anything with an automatic transmission will become extremely dangerous without the ability to disengage the engine from the drivetrain. For this reason I highly suspect that the clutch lever on a single speed (or automatic multi speed transmission) is not to be considered a part of the transmission shifting system and is only a neutral gear setting that allows disengagement of the motor from the wheel for emergency stopping and transportation of a disabled vehicle.

Can't f*** with safety, not even "the man" can hold a hand up against that defense. Especially because if they do then a s**t ton of people (class actions save lives) can sue the crap out of them claiming they've been forced to drive unsafe vehicles and claim injury from it.
 
Back
Top